In T8879#168649, @sethfl wrote:

I love Joplin as well, but just download the appimage for now (or file a request on github for snap/flatpak support). This has also already been said by one of the lead devs:

In T7667#158886, @JoshStrobl wrote:

Thank you for your feedback, it's been rejected per our package inclusion policy and my decision is final on the matter.

It has also been denied multiple other times (see T6488 and T8384).
And to respond to @EbonJaeger, there is no difference. The only "unique" thing about the app is it's UI. If you want a note taking app that can sync with cloud services and supports markdown that is already in the Solus repositories, see QOwnNotes and boostnote.

Blocked until D10618: [WIP] Initial commit of dotnet lands.

In T9711#184587, @HildaTheDev wrote:

Anyway my ibus-bamboo*eopkg is still the newest version

Ah, too bad. I had this actually compiled for myself a while back, and was thinking about including it, if it improved. I'll still check it out from time to time.

@serebit Nice catch. Thanks!

We might not want to include this in the repos, as the maintainer is against distributions patching this software, and in their words:

As a heads up. With the next release of NoiseTorch, you will have to either stop applying patches, or rename, as will other distributions.

So we can either distribute it completely unpatched, distribute it under a different name, or just not distribute it at all.

Correct source is https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/fs/xfs/xfsdump/xfsdump-3.1.9.tar.xz

I would note that I am already maintaining the lxc package and would be taking on maintaining this as well. I already have it built and well-tested locally and if approved would like the creation of the following repositories (for LXD and dependencies):

• raft
• dqlite
• lxcfs
• lxd

Aha thanks! This is why I can never get a full score on my math tests.

The license is BSD-3-Clause so it is open source :D

I'd rather not see yet another vendored build of LLVM get added into the repos. This seems to use TWO, one for Bolt and one for itself. Their claims of "20%" faster don't really seem good enough to justify it during development either. If you are looking for a Python JIT, PyPy looks like a similar level of performance without such annoying vendored libraries. Cython will be consistently faster than either of them.

@HildaTheDev you should not be uploading files as part of a Package Request. And you should never be uploading an eopkg archive for ANY reason on Phab.

Anyway my ibus-bamboo*eopkg is still the newest version

Thank you 😄 Best wishes for Solus 🙏

This package has already been accepted for inclusion here https://dev.getsol.us/T8520
And someone already pushed the patch here: https://dev.getsol.us/D10125
This patch is still waiting for review, and I don't know why isn't accepted yet.

Haha thanks :)

In T9709#184557, @GZGavinZhao wrote:

From my observation, they seem to be performing similar actions to make check (though I'm not sure).

In T9709#184555, @GZGavinZhao wrote:

May I become a maintainer?

I've tried to build from source and it's working. cvc4 and z3 are listed as optional dependencies (SMT solver and dependencies), so even without them we still have a stable and functional build of solidity. From my observation, they seem to be performing similar actions to make check (though I'm not sure).