I'd would be willing to test it on my machine. Not sure if I can provide more in terms of verification.

I will probably try again. it got stuck after the build had finished.

In T5736#150978, @DataDrake wrote:

So, When I pushed this to the build server it got stuck during the last stage of compressing the archives. I'm not sure what the cause is yet.

I'll land a patch if there is a new release.

So, When I pushed this to the build server it got stuck during the last stage of compressing the archives. I'm not sure what the cause is yet.

Probably not, but is this enough, @JoshStrobl?

In T7523#150076, @zerocon wrote:

a new release featuring support for latest Budgie git first

I had already spoken with the developer (I had translated it to Hebrew), and he recommended to wait until 0.4 (0.3 is the development stage of 0.4), since 0.2 is rather buggy (0.3 a.k.a. is running flawlessly here, by the way.

Thanks hashhsah.

open-modelica is not one package, it'd be a group of 6-7 packages. I have a recent project that involves modelica, but only touches a small portion of the software. I'm afraid that even if I prepared the packages for solus, I won't be able to adequately verify that the build was correct.

Seems like it already has a stable release (version 0.2), see here https://github.com/maoschanz/drawing/releases
They should probably update their github repo summary if they really left the beta phase.

That's not 100% accurate. They are releasing canary builds on github and those are the officially supported builds until 2.0 is fully tagged.

@eyecreate This task was accepted which means anyone can submit a package for it.
Then the package will be reviewed and once all the remarks will be addressed, it will be added in the repository.

I have created package configs for steamos-compositor and steamos-modeswitch-inhibitor. Let me know what steps are needed to get these in the repos.(I believe these packages need to be accepted first)

I'll get a look at this

Closing due to dependency going dark.

We've been waiting for months for a stable release and it is clear that isn't going to happen any time soon. Closing until the situation changes.

This hasn;t seen a new release in almost 6 months and is still marked as pre-release. Closing until that situation changes.

This has sat in accepted for inclusion for over 30 days. Clearly, there is a lack of demand for the inclusion of this software, nobody has stepped up to provide a completed patch, maintain it, and properly integrate it. Closing as a result. Feel free to reopen but only when someone offers a patch via our proper patch submission methods and volunteers to be maintainer.

This has sat in accepted for inclusion for over 30 days. Clearly, there is a lack of demand for the inclusion of this software, nobody has stepped up to provide a completed patch, maintain it, and properly integrate it. Closing as a result. Feel free to reopen but only when someone offers a patch via our proper patch submission methods and volunteers to be maintainer.

This has sat in accepted for inclusion for over 30 days. Clearly, there is a lack of demand for the inclusion of this software, nobody has stepped up to provide a completed patch, maintain it, and properly integrate it. Closing as a result. Feel free to reopen but only when someone offers a patch via our proper patch submission methods and volunteers to be maintainer.

This has sat in accepted for inclusion for over 30 days. Clearly, there is a lack of demand for the inclusion of this software, nobody has stepped up to provide a completed patch, maintain it, and properly integrate it. Closing as a result. Feel free to reopen but only when someone offers a patch via our proper patch submission methods and volunteers to be maintainer.

This has sat in accepted for inclusion for over 30 days. Clearly, there is a lack of demand for the inclusion of this software, nobody has stepped up to provide a completed patch, maintain it, and properly integrate it. Closing as a result. Feel free to reopen but only when someone offers a patch via our proper patch submission methods and volunteers to be maintainer.

This has sat in accepted for inclusion for over 30 days. Clearly, there is a lack of demand for the inclusion of this software, nobody has stepped up to provide a completed patch, maintain it, and properly integrate it. Closing as a result. Feel free to reopen but only when someone offers a patch via our proper patch submission methods and volunteers to be maintainer.

This has sat in accepted for inclusion for over 30 days. Clearly, there is a lack of demand for the inclusion of this software, nobody has stepped up to provide a completed patch, maintain it, and properly integrate it. Closing as a result. Feel free to reopen but only when someone offers a patch via our proper patch submission methods and volunteers to be maintainer.

This is still very much beta as they rework things.I'm closing this until the installation no longer relies on python 2 and they stop referring to development as WIP.

This has sat in accepted for inclusion for over 30 days. Clearly, there is a lack of demand for the inclusion of this software, nobody has stepped up to provide a completed patch, maintain it, and properly integrate it. Closing as a result. Feel free to reopen but only when someone offers a patch via our proper patch submission methods and volunteers to be maintainer.

This has sat in accepted for inclusion for over 30 days. Clearly, there is a lack of demand for the inclusion of this software, nobody has stepped up to provide a completed patch, maintain it, and properly integrate it. Closing as a result. Feel free to reopen but only when someone offers a patch via our proper patch submission methods and volunteers to be maintainer.

It would be nice to have this feature in Solus.
Thinkpad x250

Would love to have this as well. I use a thinkpad X230.

I just noticed the whole deal and went through related threads and how people submitted the package but were rejected due to:

I have a patch to submit, but wondering if it should include the server binary.
If the server executable is included, i feel obliged to add the default config file and systemd service unit file. However I don't think I feel comfortable to enable nbd service.