- User Since
- Nov 9 2018, 12:07 AM (67 w, 3 d)
Dec 16 2019
Add a reference to the upstream issue edit: (to the commit body)
Let's get the description moved to be immediately after summary, otherwise LGTM, thanks!
Bump package release, thanks @Jacalz o/
I'm not sure what's going on with the pspec file here... I get this massive diff: https://paste.sr.ht/~robertgzr/a598cf3ca6dc4fb47017f357bedc05f9669015d2
Nov 26 2019
Jun 21 2019
Apr 16 2019
What's the status of this? I hit this myself trying to package imv
Apr 10 2019
Mar 23 2019
Mar 22 2019
Mar 19 2019
Mar 12 2019
This will be blocked on https://dev.getsol.us/D5611
Mar 5 2019
Mar 4 2019
I have updated wayland-protocols to 1.17 https://dev.getsol.us/D5611
Feb 15 2019
Rebase repo onto https://dev.getsol.us/source/alacritty/
Feb 10 2019
Feb 7 2019
Feb 4 2019
You have to keep in mind that the solus team is not the biggest so it sometimes takes a while... and this is foss after all so they don't really owe you anyting ;)
Jan 21 2019
Include 0.2.6 and 0.2.7
Jan 14 2019
Adding this enables hardware acceleration when screencapturing
Jan 12 2019
forgot to add the updated pspec -.-
Jan 1 2019
Dec 29 2018
Fixes according to review
Dec 27 2018
I had literally submitted a differential before creating this task - which was pointed out to me to be a mistake :p
Dec 16 2018
Added the terminfo files to the package
Dec 12 2018
What needs to be done to move this forward?
Dec 11 2018
@Girtablulu I was aware of their request not to package it at this point...
Do I also create separate tasks for the new dependencies?
Addressed comments and updated to latest release v0.2.4
Nov 21 2018
Skip 0.3.0 in favour of 0.3.1 (latest)
But I just saw https://github.com/neovim/pynvim/releases/tag/0.3.1
Nov 16 2018
If anybody is familiar with fish, can you check that this is right.
I checked https://fishshell.com/docs/current/index.html under the "Where to put completions" section
and third-party vendor provided seemed to be appropriate.
Nov 15 2018
I mentioned it because it seems an indicator (to me at least) they actually want people to package it
As a heads up, it seems like they're doing proper versioned builds now, including deb packages
Sorry for the noise then :p
Sorry if I'm spamming here... I would love to contribute to solus more now. Do I just go ahead and open a pkg update for review if I already have the patch for it? For new pkgs it seems you need to have at least a request for them before submitting them for inclusion
Do I make a package request myself?
Nov 11 2018
@Jacalz awesome, thanks
Nov 9 2018
I've been using the same keepass database for as long as I've been on the internet. The last at least 2 years of this time with KeeWeb, mostly because MacPass was abandoned and it had tags which I began to use instead of groups.