In D7486#119319, @Jacalz wrote:

Sorry to take this further here, but I just want to get this out before you open a task @maverick1. I have already asked the brave devs about help on getting that fixed and it seems that nobody knows how to fix the issue. I haven’t been able to find any way to fix this. It doesn’t impact the users in any way so it doesn’t really need to be fixed...

I don't know how hard it is but I will appreciate it if you can remove unknown from About Brave given below.
Version 0.69.135 Chromium: 77.0.3865.120 (Official Build) unknown (64-bit)

Removed replaces key and created a pull request https://github.com/getsolus/solus-sc/pull/30

Kept n before p and removed paterns

I don't thing the words in summary should be that big. And you might want ko omit the Thanks Heading.

It is working now!

I think it is not rebased properly!

@xulongwu4, is the patch for OpenCV 4 needed? Because we have got 3.4.7 version in our repo.

Bump to 2.2.6

Because pkgconfig is better than the package name.

Thanks @Harvey. I just did the mistake which you told :P.

Remove '-'

Bump to 0.25.0

In D7132#113818, @JoshStrobl wrote:

Apologies for the delay, let's get this updated to 0.25.0. Patch looks good otherwise ?

Thanks @algent !

In D7086#112974, @kyrios123 wrote:

In D7086#112970, @maverick1 wrote:

@kyrios123 Can you help me avoiding the test fail if I run tests from tests/runtests.py ?

Perhaps you could provide the logs, that would be helpful ! ?

@kyrios123 Can you help me avoiding the test fail if I run tests from tests/runtests.py ?

I need help building geckodriver. Can anyone help me to package it? Here is the package.yml file made so far.

@joebonrichie thanks for claiming it!

Bump to 6.0.1

It has been long since this patch has been submitted. May I know the cause of its deferral and the other patches that I have submitted?

Why hasn't it been landed yet?

In T7794#156461, @JoshStrobl wrote:

It's currently blocked by:

1. Broken appstream metadata for the Software Center, per T7805. I need to remind @DataDrake when he gets the time to rebuild it against his local repo (since my home server is running Fedora with a newer version of appstream-glib and I haven't had success with my patched newer version of it, whereas at least Bryan's machine with the local repo is running Solus so he can rebuild it using our version of appstream-glib with the eopkg patches).
2. Some smaller infra changes I would want to do first (namely moving us over to Fastly again with RIT as a backend)
3. I'd like to implement a desktop icon view in Budgie so I could finally update Nautilus. Fairly trivial to do but I just haven't been able to find the time for it.

Bump to 0.3.7

Bump to 3.3.6

Bump to 0.5.1

Bump to 0.15.5

In D6692#106315, @JoshStrobl wrote:

Does spyder (not spyder3) need to be updated against this?

@JoshStrobl Thanks Josh!

In D6877#108588, @Jacalz wrote:

Just a little tip for you on getting a more readable summary:

• Changes can be changed to Changelog: or Summarized Changelog: if you have summarized it.
• The CVEs can be put under Security: below the Changelog.

Just a little tip, not super important though :)

Are my Differential Revisions deferred?

Bump to 4.8.0

Used solbuild local repo!

Built using local repo!

Shortened description.

Yes, the requirement needs it to be updated!

Profiles working, and incoming and outgoing were set and status were checked form command line. Report and log were also working properly.

19.10 release from the trunk series released 2019-06-23. Didn't this update work?

Update flask to 1.1.1

I will edit this as soon as D6688 gets landed. I have added D6688 as a parent to this revision.

Removed check because D6688 should be available first for it to check.