Fix MAINTAINERS.md indentation

@algent I'm leaving Matrix in there, Joshua told me I could put it there if I had one.

Add MAINTAINERS.md

Okay, I'll revise that once I get home.

Ok, there didn't seem to be any mention of a Maintainers file in the Packaging pages, it might need to be updated. I only saw mention of the "packager" file which I did create: https://getsol.us/articles/packaging/building-a-package/en/

I haven't done this before, but is there something missing? It's been a week since I've created the initial commit, I've tested it (of course) and everything works as it should. I haven't been told if there are any errors or if I was missing anything in the process, there's no other instructions in https://getsol.us/articles/packaging/.

Changed Clang key to 'yes'

I've successfully created and submitted a new patch, everything works as intended on my system.
https://dev.getsol.us/D10534

Noted. That was some time ago and I'm not sure how often these requests are seen once closed.

Any way this could be reconsidered by maintainers? This package would be quite relevant to a package request I just made. ( https://dev.getsol.us/T9526 )

Er.. The question of what would replace Nautilus is for another place, at another time, I'm just making a package request. Speaking of, is there any particular reason Polo being Beta would hold it back from inclusion? Polo itself is plenty stable, in any case, much more so than Nautilus. I believe the developer is only calling it Beta due to some non-typical peripheral features that he wants to include, but isn't done yet. I'll see if I can get some sort of comment
on that from him.

It'd be a top contender. Just give it some Solus' Sane Defaults™ and it'd be a good fit.

And thanks to Ikey and Team for hearing us out on this issue. We all just want Solus to be the best that it can be for users (and everyone else) without having to compromise an otherwise solid system. :)

I'm not under the impression that anything any other distro does is sane (trust me, I didn't come to Solus because the others were too logical), I'm just saying that the norm of other distros has put Solus in a bad position, and it won't be as simple as ignoring the problem.

I understand the sentiment, but it still doesn't help that installing 'wine' doesn't actually install 'wine'... if you understand what I mean.

I certainly expect it to be in the menu / actually be able to run a Windows program after installing what's "supposed" to be WINE.

I tried the 'Close as duplicate' the first time but didn't find QGIS. That was my mistake. I apologize.

I know how the packages are made.

If there's nothing wrong with this on the technical side of things, I wouldn't mind seeing this included. I've been meaning to look into some new games.

@DataDrake I thought it would be an easy and open source launcher that could launch Vanilla Minecraft easily for people, versus creating the /opt/Minecraft/ directory, manually downloading the jar, and making a .desktop file.

@JoshStrobl marked this task as "Accepted For Inclusion" but then @DataDrake marked this as Wontfix. Is there an explanation?

These are just small console games, what's wrong with packaging them in 32-bit? It's not like it's wasting resources. In any which case, these aren't really maintained by anyone, so there's not really an alternative. If it's not worth it, you can just mark this as invalid.