Simplify make install

Thanks @joebonrichie!

Sorry, just noticed this is a dup of T4623.

While the packages should be updated (although it's a lot of work for @DataDrake), what's wrong with using stack in the meantime?

Sorry for the delay on this!

Include abi_report changes

I just ran make again and nothing changed except the date in the pspec. Not sure why there would be significant changes to those files given the very minor code change?

Don't use /usr/local

Rebuild

Specify correct license

Add back other files, sigh

Add MAINTAINERS.md

Sorry, I was planning on abandoning it if the package was rejected.

Will do

Update title and summary

Not too sure what you mean. If it's that the summary starts with "and" I was trying to continue the sentence from the title. Probably easier to just include all information in the title.

Use pkgconfig and add maintainers

The files for those platforms are used for cross-compilation.

Ready for review

Get tests running

Waiting for v1.5.0 to be released with a fix for https://github.com/crystal-lang/crystal/issues/12036 before re-enabling interpreter.

Disable interpreter

Set target

Think I have fixed it by setting CRYSTAL_CONFIG_TARGET. Currently building, which takes a long time even when setting threads, which I'm not confident actually does anything.

FTR, the error is

In D13210#225962, @oly wrote:

how can I change the message so it does not say Initial inclusion of Babashka resolves it does not show in the git log so I guess there is a arc command to change it ?

Not sure why the docs for OptionParser/TSort were included then nuked, but ri TSort --no-standard-docs --system still resolves.

Oops, yes, I'm so used to just doing add -u

Include wrapper

Requested changes

Requested changes

Yes happy to take it. It indeed pulls in openjfx with gradle. We can deprecate openjfx-8 after this as jabref is the only dep. By the way, the description for the new openjdk-17 currently states it "includes [...] OpenJFX 17."

jabref is another Java 8 application, possibly not here because it depends only on openjfx-8. I have the latest version of it building with the bootstrap package.

Sort builddeps

That's a shame, I doubt I have time for that right now. Why when it's the same version and there are no code changes? I'm guessing the concern is something in the toolchain breaking things, but is testing a few (e.g. nano, fish, less) common revdeps not enough?

Personally I have no idea how related those issues are. Seems like @DataDrake would be the one to know. It's interesting that she mentioned symbol versioning in the first task.

Oh this is a cool project! Thanks for letting me know about it.

Debump version

Thank you for your help!

Sort builddeps

Address comments

See if this fixes phab warnings

Not sure if I got component : desktop.plasma right, it was just a guess!

I patched the error above, and got a use of deleted function error in a completely different place as my reward. So I assume the source has changed because this never would have compiled.

Maybe retitle this to "flatpak requires supervisor to add repo."

In D12612#213899, @Girtablulu wrote:

did you check jabref if it still functional when we are not building webkit?