@108saimon I just removed and re-installed Chrome from the Software Center without a problem. Could you try it again? Maybe you just got unlucky and ran into some sort of connection issue between you and the google download servers.

Installing Chrome works fine for me, and it's at the latest version for stable. A dev-channel update was released yesterday (after I already went to bed), which I will update to in a couple minutes.

Fix dependency order

Fix builddeps order, fix PREFIX

Use single instead of doulbe quotes around version

Rebase on current version

I can confirm this problem with the nvidia-developer-driver-current. Just tried it with the free game "b" and I get the exact same error message that is mentioned in the linked thread.

I've created a package for version 2.1.6-beta2. Works fine with current Qt now. I'm waiting for the stable release to create a diff.

Rebase on current version

Actually update pspec.xml too

Actually bump release number

Fix package name and don't hardcode version in setup

@DataDrake Fine by me, I wasn't sure what to do here to be honest. I just thought calling it "OneDrive" would make it sound like an official Microsoft app, and took the name from the Task, which is also the header of the Readme.

The sed-stuff is because the original Makefile tries to get git version information, which obviously doesn't work with the tar.gz archive and is a bit silly for a release.

Interesting, seems like either something is blocking your connection to the GitKraken servers, or their download servers were down. It shouldn't normally try to download from solus-project.com.
This is of course beside the point of the Software Center completely locking up.

Thank you for the input, kyrios123. I've changed everything accordingly; totally forgot about using python3, even though I did so with another package I built for myself.

Use python3, order licenses alphabetically and only mention licenses once

Thank you again for the review. I don't mind the delay, since I know you've been busy (and m64py isn't, and shouldn't, be too high on the Solus priority list ^^).

Restructure licenses part again, according to Josh's suggestions

Thank you for the review! I changed everything as requested, though I am still unsure about the licenses part. Is it okay like this now, or if it is not, could you maybe point me to another example of a package with multiple licenses like this?

Orderd deps alphabetically, removed unused setup part, added additional licenses

Remove unnecessary builddep

Actually, forget what I was saying, it works perfectly fine on my end now. Not sure what the problem was before. I'll submit something soon.

I will try to find that out and report back.

So, I've created a package locally, but I have one question: As it stands, it doesn't auto-detect the mupen64plus library and you have to manually locate it. Is this acceptable?

Alright. Is the systemd update available on here already so I can maybe test it? (A quick search didn't show me anything, but then again I'm not used to working with phabricator)

No problem at all!

Okay, I just tested pcsx2. I found one minor issue and one small improvement over the old version. So overall a neutral result ^^ (actually in this case I would favour the new version)

I just tried Dolphin-Emu and encountered several issues. I've created an album on imgur with screenshots and descriptions to show the problems:

Whoops, sry, was in a hurry this morning and apparently didn't search thoroughly enough.