@clivejo kup (kernel) hasn't seen a release in 3 years so wouldn't be eligible for inclusion anyways. If people need it, they can install it themselves. If they are using ypkg to build it, they will kind out soon enough that there's a name conflict and adjust accordingly. We cannot and should not base package naming decisions on something that doesn't exist in the repo at the time of Request.

What error(s) are you getting? You've given us nothing to go on.

This is fixed in Unstable, pending a quick sync after I touch base with @JoshStrobl.