Hi,
I would like to start using (containerized) applications that use JACK through Pipewire; however the package has been built specifically with its support disabled.
If feasible, I'd like to enable the JACK support for this package.
Hi,
I would like to start using (containerized) applications that use JACK through Pipewire; however the package has been built specifically with its support disabled.
If feasible, I'd like to enable the JACK support for this package.
It was turned off when we had old JACK, but should now be feasible now that we have JACK2 :)
@Jacalz is this your cup of tea? If so, feel free to give it a try as I don't see any one person consistently doing pipewire updates...
Can I attach a second request to enable the PipeWire util binaries (pw-jack, pw-pulse, etc.) or should I make a second ticket ?
Looks like the pw-jack and pw-pulse got built automatically. Will try do some testing and hopefully get a revision out in a few days.
Alright. Looking into this, it is very clear to me that I have absolutely no idea how to test this. Documentation is scarce or non existing :I
Bummer. :/
It might pay to join the #pipewire IRC channel on Freenode?
EDIT: Perhaps this document is useful? https://docs.automotivelinux.org/docs/en/master/apis_services/reference/audio/audio/pipewire.html
Sorry people. I haven’t had any luck with getting this thing set up for testing due to the poor amount of documentation for doing so. I probably won’t have the time to put in more effort into this due to having a lot going on in life at the moment. Someone else will have to continue this.
Will post my package.yml when I get back to my computer.
Seconded. Wish I could help with this task (especially since I'm the one asking), but I feel there are too many low-level details to know about to do this properly.
Thanks for the work you did put in! And best of luck with real life too.
Thanks for the kind words. Here are the resulting files for how for I managed to get:
EDIT: The patch is no longer necessary with latest releases of pipewire.
@YakoYakoYokuYoku Do you think this could be something you would be willing to work on, given the work you are putting into updating and testing D10026? 🙂