Pardon my asking, but what entry requirements need to be waived to get this included?

If the software appears in Debian and/or Ubuntu, and openSUSE, in the currently active, core repositories, the maintainer is permitted to waive some entry requirements (This does not apply to software license, legality or known-insecure software. Additionally this cannot be used to bypass the server rules.). PPAs, OBS projects outside of the openSUSE: namespace, or Arch Linux, do NOT add any weight to a request.

I would appreciate clarification so as to not request in the future packages that will be rejected.

Thanks.

It isn't that other entry requirements need to be waived, it's that if it appears in those operating system's core repositories, then other requirements **may* be waived, such as specifics on value add, software age, etc.

Josh, that part is clear.

However as I understand (and I could be mistaken) this project is alive and produces stable releases, is useful (as it complements another package 'rclone' that I assume was also deemed useful), can be redistributed and is not complicated to incorporate into Solus. As a matter of fact I extracted the binary from the ubuntu .deb and it works out of the box.

Again, I ask only to better understand the criteria used, thanks.

Could this be reopened? Could use something like this to sync to my portable hard drive.

@JoshStrobl The GitHub for this project has been archived and the author mentions at the top it's no longer active/maintained. Should we still proceed with packaging this?

How about this fork: https://github.com/kapitainsky/RcloneBrowser ?

In T2956#162092, @kyrios123 wrote:

How about this fork: https://github.com/kapitainsky/RcloneBrowser ?

Oh nice! Good find @kyrios123.