The inclusion of qmmp fixes T5356
Signed-off-by: Brian Urbina <brian.urbina@outlook.com>
Differential D8649
Updated Commit of QMMP to latest version Authored by melosaiyan on Apr 10 2020, 2:59 PM. Tags None Referenced Files
Subscribers
Details
The inclusion of qmmp fixes T5356 Signed-off-by: Brian Urbina <brian.urbina@outlook.com> Played some audio tracks successfully
Diff Detail
Event TimelineComment Actions hey thanks for the response! Should release number be 2 or 1.1? Not sure what the version convention should be. Comment Actions Yes the release number should be 2. Comment Actions I bumped the release number but then got a dependency error that the libvorbis release needed to be >= 12 and currently there's release 11 out there. I don't remember seeing this before and building with QMMP 1.3.6 gave the same error. What would be the cause of this dependency change? Is there a way to request a new release to be added for libvorbis? Comment Actions It is reporting correctly. libvorpis was rebuilded today. Authored by DataDrake on Mon, Apr 13, 7:07 AM. Release it is 12. https://dev.getsol.us/source/libvorbis/ Comment Actions Oh I see so it was updated today. How do I go about getting release 12 or is that something I would need to wait for? Apologize for the newbie question. Comment Actions You have to be in Unstable repository, if you want to do packaging. Comment Actions Updated QMMP install to next release version Bumped up the release version to the package.yml file Comment Actions Appreciate all the useful information, thank you. I made the updated and will review the documentation you provided for future reference. Comment Actions Looking more to this. qmmp was never included in repo so you can't update it like this. Comment Actions At the moment this revision is wrong. Comment Actions I attempted to continue the first work to update to the latest qmmp but for some reason I could not commit to D8150. When I did the arc diff it created this new one, D8649. I'd like to continue the first work but now that I created this new version, I'll have to figure out how to continue the first work and invalidate this one, to avoid confusion. Comment Actions That is why you should pay attention to Solus Packaging Documentation to avoid issues like this when submitting a package. It is not that difficult. See how other people are doing their changes and ask for help in IRC channel for things that you don't understand. Comment Actions I've read the documentation for building a package several times and watched the Solus videos where Josh goes through a patch as well so it was straightforward for me. My revisions worked fine until I was attempting to make updates after taking a break from updating my package where I don't know how to deal with issues with arc diff. I didn't utilize the IRC chat to ask for help so I will do this next time I come across issues. I really appreciate your help with everything. I do want to contribute and hope to be better with my patches. The Solus community is amazing :)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||