Initial inclusion of opam
AbandonedPublic
Actions

Authored by • jalden on Oct 8 2018, 4:41 PM.

Details

Reviewers

DataDrake

Group Reviewers

Triage Team

Maniphest Tasks

T3436: Opam

Summary

Initial commit of opam, fixes T3436.

Test Plan

Built the package with make
Install the produced binary artifact
Tested the following opam commands:
- opam init
- opam list
- opam show
- opam install
- opam remove
- opam update
- opam upgrade
- opam config
- opam repository
- opam switch (Tested system (currently 4.07.0), 4.07.1 and 4.02.3)
- opam pin
- opam admin
Tested that man pages were installed correctly (man opam and man opam-x where x is an opam command, for example, man opam-init)

Diff Detail

Branch

master

Lint

No Lint Coverage

Unit

No Test Coverage

Event Timeline

• jalden created this revision.Oct 8 2018, 4:41 PM

Herald added a reviewer: Triage Team. · View Herald TranscriptOct 8 2018, 4:41 PM

• jalden requested review of this revision.Oct 8 2018, 4:41 PM

• jalden mentioned this in T3436: Opam.Oct 8 2018, 4:45 PM

DataDrake requested changes to this revision.Oct 18 2018, 1:31 AM

DataDrake added a subscriber: DataDrake.

DataDrake added inline comments.

package.yml
8	Needs to follow SPDX 3.0 License List.

This revision now requires changes to proceed.Oct 18 2018, 1:31 AM

• jalden added inline comments.Oct 18 2018, 8:46 AM

package.yml
8	Oh okay, sorry about that. How do I choose between `LGPL-2.1-only` and `LGPL-2.1-or-later`? I thought I understood the difference between them, but on the SPDX website, the license texts are identical, and they both say the following: This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. That sounds to me like the `LGPL-2.1-only` license text contradicts the name of license. Also, the OCaml license specifies an exception at the top. Does this affect the license that should be applied to it? Here is a link to the license for reference: https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/blob/trunk/LICENSE

This is -or-later since it has not been explicitly called out elsewhere as -only. You can ignore the license exception since afaict it doesn't apply to us.

so-lo added a subscriber: so-lo.Dec 29 2018, 11:25 PM

Closing due to lack of movement.