I'm not sure how to proceed with R1601. It was disabled because there was a file conflict, but that is now resolved with this commit.

I wanted to create a diff to R1601 but I'm unable to pull it.

See T10209.

In D13297#227560, @GZGavinZhao wrote:

I'm not sure how to proceed with R1601. It was disabled because there was a file conflict, but that is now resolved with this commit.

I wanted to create a diff to R1601 but I'm unable to pull it.

See T10209.

Okay, I have re-activated the lapack repository (R1601) for you, so you can now pull from it and submit a diff.

Note that we'll also have to undeprecate it in the solus-sc data: https://github.com/getsolus/solus-sc/blob/master/repo_data/distribution.xml.in#L104

Also things like gretl seem to rely on the OpenBLAS lapack support, if I'm reading it correctly

https://dev.getsol.us/source/gretl/

Beep-Boop! Gavin's dependency bot would like to inform you that according to symbol removal from abi_symbols, the following packages need to be rebuilt:

• Package suitesparse needs rebuilding!
• Package gretl needs rebuilding!
• Package jags needs rebuilding!
• Package ceres-solver needs rebuilding!
• Package gromacs needs rebuilding!
• Package pytorch needs rebuilding!
• Package scipy needs rebuilding!
• Package python2-numpy needs rebuilding!
• Package octave needs rebuilding!
• Package opencv needs rebuilding!
• Package arpack needs rebuilding!
• Package numpy needs rebuilding!
• Package qrupdate needs rebuilding!

Also julia and suitesparce seem to use openblas for lapack support (at least it seems that way looking at the package.yml)

Maybe a task to track this wouldn't hurt.

Good catch. Thanks!