Page MenuHomeSolus

Initial commit of qt5-docs
ClosedPublic

Authored by livingsilver94 on May 10 2021, 7:43 PM.
Referenced Files
F10986518: D11049.diff
Mon, Jul 24, 1:42 AM
F10944401: D11049.diff
Fri, Jul 14, 11:24 PM
F10903893: D11049.diff
Jul 5 2023, 6:49 PM
F10895975: D11049.id26752.diff
Jul 1 2023, 8:47 PM
F10823844: D11049.id26614.diff
Jun 3 2023, 8:50 AM
F10793448: D11049.id26752.diff
May 27 2023, 11:25 AM
F10792363: D11049.id26614.diff
May 27 2023, 7:00 AM
F10792185: D11049.id26802.diff
May 27 2023, 6:19 AM

Details

Summary

Initial commit of qt5-docs. Fixes T2831.

Test Plan

Qt Creator shows examples when installing this package with qt5-base-demos.

Diff Detail

Repository
R5242 qt5-docs
Lint
Lint Not Applicable
Unit
Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

Note that with this package, we have all the Qt5 documentation in one package while demos are split among multiple packages. Let me know if you want a coherent approach or you're good with the current situation.

Let me rewrite what I wrote on IRC so that Core can reason about it:

We could leave qt5-docs as it is, or we could create split -docs packages like this: ^qt5-base-docs, ^qt5-3d-docs and have qt5-docs as a "metapackage" exactly how we did with libreoffice.
We could also so the same with -demos subpackages.

When you answer my messages, I'll create a PR for solus-sc to undeprecate qt5-docs.

livingsilver94 retitled this revision from Initial commit of qt5-doc to Initial commit of qt5-docs.May 10 2021, 8:40 PM
livingsilver94 edited the summary of this revision. (Show Details)

I wouldn't split it up because it really has just one use case for qt-creator

package.yml
16

pkgconfig doesn't work?

This revision now requires changes to proceed.May 14 2021, 8:01 PM
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.May 15 2021, 1:28 PM

Completely slipped my mind that this should have replaces for the -docs packages to prevent file conflicts.

This revision now requires changes to proceed.May 16 2021, 1:30 PM

Oh, right. And we should deprecate qt5-base-docs from solus-sc I guess?

This revision was not accepted when it landed; it landed in state Needs Review.May 29 2021, 3:17 PM
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.